Product
Litigation
- Early Case Assessment
- Evidence Analysis
- Web Search
- Document Review
- Discovery at Scale
- Production Setup
- Connectors
- Dictation
- Deep Research
- Legal Research (Upcoming)
Transactional
Solutions
Litigation
- Early Case Assessment
- Investigations & Subpoenas
- Trial Preparation
- Enterprise eDiscovery
- Cloud eDiscovery
Transactional
Who it’s for
Resources
Learn
Customers
Events & CLE
What is the best eDiscovery platform for small to mid-size law firms?
The best eDiscovery platform for small to mid-size law firms combines AI-powered review, published pricing, and no vendor onboarding requirements. DecoverAI is purpose-built for firms processing 5–500 GB per matter — with plans from $299 per seat per month and no seat minimum on Advanced.
Seat prices from our published plans. AI usage is billed per token ($5 per million input, $20 per million output), and additional storage is $60/GB/month. No onboarding costs. See full pricing details.
Why Enterprise eDiscovery Platforms Don't Work for Small Firms
Relativity, Everlaw, and CS Disco were designed for large litigation departments with dedicated litigation support staff, IT teams, and annual budgets in the hundreds of thousands. For a 10-attorney firm taking on a commercial dispute or white-collar matter, these platforms create more overhead than they solve.
- High per-seat pricing and seat minimums force firms to pay for capacity they may not use. A 10-user minimum at $200–$400/seat means $2,000–$4,000/month before a single document is processed.
- Vendor onboarding takes weeks, not hours. Enterprise platforms require a sales cycle, a statement of work, dedicated project managers, and configuration by a litigation support vendor — none of which is practical when opposing counsel serves a request with a 30-day response window.
- Annual minimum commitments assume predictable, high-volume caseloads. For firms with variable matter volume, paying for capacity you don't use every month makes no economic sense.
- Dedicated IT requirements — user provisioning, SSO configuration, data hosting agreements — assume you have an internal IT department. Most small and mid-size firms do not.
What Small Firms Actually Need
eDiscovery requirements for a small or mid-size firm are fundamentally different from those of BigLaw. The platform that works is one that fits the matter, not one that requires the matter to fit the platform.
- Published, predictable pricing — no hidden processing fees or prepaid credits that expire. Know your cost before you upload a single file.
- No seat minimum — add attorneys one seat at a time instead of buying a 10-user block. Review shouldn't require paying for seats nobody uses.
- Self-serve setup in minutes — create a matter, upload documents, and begin review the same day. No vendor configuration, no project manager required.
- AI document review without a litigation support team — automated relevance tagging, privilege detection, and privilege log generation that any associate can operate, not just a certified Relativity administrator.
- SOC 2 compliant hosting — attorney-client privilege and work product protection require enterprise-grade security. Every matter on DecoverAI is hosted on SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA-compliant infrastructure.
How DecoverAI Compares
| Feature | DecoverAI | Relativity | Everlaw |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Published per-seat | Per-seat + per-GB | Per-seat + per-GB |
| Seat fees | $299/user/mo, published | $150–$400/user/mo | $100–$300/user/mo |
| Setup time | Minutes | 2–6 weeks | 1–3 weeks |
| Minimum commitment | No seat minimum on Advanced | Annual contract | Annual contract |
| AI document review | Built-in, self-serve | Add-on (extra cost) | Included (complex setup) |
| Privilege log generation | Automated | Manual / vendor | Semi-automated |
| SOC 2 Type II | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| IT team required | No | Yes | Recommended |
What Small Firm Attorneys Say
"We had a white-collar matter drop in our lap on a Thursday. In 40 minutes we had 30,000 documents uploaded, tagged for relevance, and a draft privilege log. That would have taken two weeks to set up with our prior vendor — if they could even turn around the contract in time."Partner, White Collar Criminal Defense Practice
"We ran the same 30,000-document matter through DecoverAI that we had previously managed through a traditional litigation support vendor. Our all-in cost was 98% lower. The AI caught privilege issues our reviewers had missed on the first pass."Managing Partner, Boutique Litigation Firm
