Live Webinar · Aug 10 Gen AI for In-House Counsel: how we post-train an LLM to run Document Review at under 5¢/document. Save Your Seat →
Case Study · eDiscovery & Production

Thirty thousand documents. A defensible production in three days.

How a leading defense firm—with an embedded DecoverAI team that built a bespoke production workflow to the subpoena's exact spec—ran relevance, confidentiality, privilege, Bates stamping, and redaction across 30,000 documents, returned a complete response in under a week, and faced regulators with the winning edge.

Book a demo →
Matter
Tax Credit Investigation
Volume
30,000+ documents
Deliverable
Production + privilege log
Turnaround
3 days
By the numbers

Outcomes that moved the matter forward

<1 wk
Subpoena response returned
A complete, defensible response delivered end-to-end in under a week—work that traditionally takes weeks.
Per document, vs. 6¢ industry average
Relevance Detection and Confidentiality Assessment ran at $0.01/doc—an ~83% cut on the most labor-intensive review steps.
$20K+
Saved on a single matter
A 30%+ reduction in total client cost after moving off a Reveal-based Logikcull workflow.
01The Brief

Case summary

A prominent defense firm faced a demanding challenge: reviewing over 30,000 documents tied to a complex tax credit investigation. The matter required not only thorough document review, but a complete production—privilege logs, Bates stamps, and targeted redactions—all under tight deadlines and intense regulatory scrutiny.

By leveraging DecoverAI, the legal team rapidly organized, reviewed, and produced all 30,000 documents—surfacing strategic insights and key evidence at scale, with unprecedented speed and accuracy, and ultimately strengthening their defense strategy.

The difference was a partner, not just a platform. The DecoverAI team embedded with the defense and built the production workflow to the subpoena's exact specification—relevance, privilege, Bates, and redaction wired together against the deadline. Returning a complete, defensible response in days rather than weeks let the firm meet regulators from a position of control instead of catching up.

02The Challenge

Dense records, an unforgiving clock

Tax credit investigations involve dense, highly technical documentation—financial records, correspondence, internal memoranda, and privileged communications. The defense team needed to:

  • Review 30,000+ documents
    For relevance, privilege, and responsiveness under tight regulatory deadlines.
  • Produce at scale, defensibly
    Bates stamping, privilege log entries, and redactions applied consistently across the entire document set.
  • Control cost without cutting corners
    Balancing thoroughness with the budget constraints inherent in large-scale investigations.
  • Protect sensitive material
    Safeguarding client financial data and attorney-client privileged communications throughout.
03Why DecoverAI

One platform, end‑to‑end

End-to-end production

Document review, privilege identification, Bates stamping, redaction, and privilege log generation—all within a single platform.

Accuracy & searchability

Advanced filtering and semantic search surfaced case-altering information that might have gone unnoticed in manual review.

Security by default

Encrypted processing and storage met stringent confidentiality standards for sensitive personal and professional client data.

Precision beyond standard

AI-driven analysis let the team work with greater precision—beyond eDiscovery best practice—in a fraction of the time.

04Cost & Time

The economics, side by side

For this 30,000-document matter, DecoverAI compressed both cost and turnaround against manual attorney review and the firm's prior eDiscovery vendor.

Metric Manual Attorney Review Prior eDiscovery Vendor DecoverAI
This matter
Cost per document$5.00$0.75$0.10
Total matter cost (30K docs)$150,000$22,500$3,000
Turnaround time4 weeks2–3 weeks3 days
≈ $20,000 saved

Against the firm's prior eDiscovery vendor, DecoverAI saved roughly $20,000 on a single matter—a 30%+ reduction in total client cost—while compressing turnaround from weeks to three days.

05The Impact

What the firm achieved

  • Dramatic time savings across early case assessment, review, and production—from 4 weeks down to 3 days.
  • ≈ $20,000 saved on a single matter—a 30%+ reduction in total client cost versus the firm's prior vendor.
  • Automated privilege log generation with consistent Bates stamping and targeted redactions across all 30,000 documents.
  • Reduced risk of missing key evidence or inadvertently producing privileged materials.
  • Higher confidence in case preparation and defense strategy, backed by thorough, defensible review.
  • The winning edge—an embedded team that built to the matter, so the firm answered the subpoena faster and more completely than the investigation could press.

What used to take weeks of manual review, privilege logging, and Bates stamping was completed in three days—and we were confident nothing was missed.

Partner
Tax Investigation Defense Practice

More case studies

View all →

Ready to streamline your next production?

See how DecoverAI delivers complete productions in days, not weeks.

Book a Demo →
Tax Credit Investigation
Download this case study
Enter your details to get the PDF — no demo required.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.